By adding cobbled deepslate to the group "cobble", it automatically
inherits all crafting recipes and tool repair capabilities that apply
to that group.
* Add `cobble=1` to cobbled deepslate node definition groups. This
requires a little refactoring of the deepslate variants registration
function.
* Remove stone tools, furnace and brewing stand crafting recipes.
* Register "cooking" crafting recipe for deepslate ores that enables
smelting these ores in furnaces.
* Extend deepslate ore registration function to allow passing cooking
result as argument.
* Update the deepslate ore table to include smelting results.
* Put deepslate w/ lapis drops in a separate table, making the deepslate
ores table less unwieldly.
The discussion about how to handle the new ores is still ongoing.
This PR was originally only intended to add the new nodes so
that's what it does now.
* In commit 86b2cd70f9 an extra argument
was added to the `add_large_plant()` function in order to handle silk
touch. For some reason, the callers for "double_grass" and
"double_fern" were updated with two new arguments. Because of this,
silk touch likely never worked on these nodes. This commit removes
the unused `nil` argument from both callers.
* This commit fixes#2155.
If a player wants to make a path when there is no dirt with grass on the
ground it means they need to either have silk touch to collect dirt with
grass or place dirt beside dirt with grass and wait for the grass cover
to spread before they can create the new paths …
Since the former is not possible early in the game and the latter is not
easy, this patch imitates Minecraft 1.17 behaviour; the following nodes
can now be turned into path nodes by right-clicking them with a shovel:
• Dirt (mcl_core:dirt)
• Coarse Dirt (mcl_core:coarse_dirt)
• Dirt with Grass (mcl_core:dirt_with_grass)
• Mycelium (mcl_core:mycelium)
• Podzol (mcl_core:podzol)
A group “path_creation_possible” has been added to mark nodes that can
be turned into a dirt path with a shovel. One obvious objection to that
addition might be that the “dirt” group already exists. Even though all
existing nodes that can be turned into a dirt path do indeed belong to
the “dirt” group, it is not a good idea: Changing what “dirt” means to
“any node that can be turned into a dirt path” would make it harder to
maintain the code.
cora
kabou
AFCMS
NO11
chmodsayshello
Nils Dagsson Moskopp