Rename shepherd to weaver? #4527
Labels
No Label
#P1 CRITICAL
#P2: HIGH
#P3: elevated
#P4 priority: medium
#P6: low
#Review
annoying
API
bug
code quality
combat
commands
compatibility
configurability
contribution inside
controls
core feature
creative mode
delayed for engine release
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
environment
feature request
gameplay
graphics
ground content conflict
GUI/HUD
help wanted
incomplete feature
invalid / won't fix
items
looking for contributor
mapgen
meta
mineclone2+
Minecraft >= 1.13
Minecraft >= 1.17
missing feature
mobile
mobs
mod support
model needed
multiplayer
Needs adoption
needs discussion
needs engine change
needs more information
needs research
nodes
non-mob entities
performance
player
possible close
redstone
release notes
schematics
Skyblock
sounds
Testing / Retest
tools
translation
unconfirmed
mcl5
mcla
Media missing
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: VoxeLibre/VoxeLibre#4527
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Since the shepherd works at a loom and not herds sheep, why not rename the job to Weaver, even though the trades resemble that of Minecraft shepherds?
Speaking of shepherds, this is unfortunately also a very popular profession.
Every small house has a loom, and a villager is spawned for the bed, hence it will become a shepherd.
Every medium house has a barrel and a fletching table. Large houses have a cartography table, but probably have two red beds.
It would be great if someday the shepherd could really do this job, like in MC the farmer will plant and harvest crops, a shepherd could shear sheep if some sheep are near him and for example collect them in a chest nearby.
Of course it wouldn't be nice if the player just robs the wool 😉, but it could be some kind of cooperation. The player will have to place a chest, build a fence and lure some sheep into the fenced area where the shepherd resides. In return the shepherd shares his wool with the player.
Fenced sheep enclosures will have to be big enough to have a small house inside for the shepherd and his bed.
Just an idea, a chance to make villages more alive. 🙂
Yes, and spawn some sheep when there is a shepherd, too. It makes not sense if you have a villager with 5 shepherds and no sheep. A weaver is plausibly interested in buying wool then. If that is added, the character could be renamed back - this issue is just about the strings, not an actual behavior change right now, to no have shepherds without sheep.
That's a good idea, too. In small villages in biomes with sheep, it could be the task of a player to get sheep to the shepherd and build an enclosure, but in bigger villages, a fence around a shepherd's house and some pre-spawned sheep would bring more life to a village.
I hope I do not hijack your thread if I elaborate a bit on those ideas:
More ideas (but low priority imho):
If have more ideas for other villagers, too, but as I don't know what the community thinks about it and how probable it is that this would be implemented in VL, I will leave it thus far for the moment.
If it would be better to post this in a separate feature request thread, I could do this.
Just some ideas I would love to see implemented. 😀
The butcher has a fenced enclosure (with a door to the house) likely intended to contain some farm animals, the shepherd could be similar.
A pond would likely be another predesigned structure and just someone needs to design all these and add them as alternatives. Maybe prevent them from spawning in desert, too.