Compose and document a way how we accept/unaccept features #1537

Closed
opened 2021-04-12 08:50:46 +02:00 by kay27 · 5 comments
Contributor

I'm very sorry for bothering you with organizational tasks.
Moreover, the tasks which have no clear solution for me.
This is super low priority (developing process and fixes are currently much more important).

I just know, it's very important for MCL2 future, so let me articulate some blank and I'll appreciate if we polish it to some transitional (not final, just enough to take into the work) decision:

We accept:

  1. Every MC features up to version 1.12 JE.
  2. Except features which couldn't be done easily and bugfree because of Minetest engine limitations. Eg. we CAN extend world boundaries by playing with map chunks, just teleporting player onto next layer after 31000 , but it would cost too much (time, code, bugs, performance, stability, etc).
  3. Every already finished and working good features from versions above.
  4. Some features, approved by the rest of the community, I mean maybe some voting and really missing any negative feedback.
  5. All features documented by Wuzzy as done intentionally, like this.

We reject:

  1. Any features which cause critical bugs, sending them to rework/fix or trying to fix immediately.
  2. Maybe (I'm not sure) some small portions of big entirely missing features which just definitely break gamplay balance and gives nothing useful.
  3. Controversial features, which somebody support, somebody doesn't, should be discussed well, with publishing forum announcements, at least during the week. In case if there are still doubts - send them into the mod.
I'm very sorry for bothering you with organizational tasks. Moreover, the tasks which have no clear solution for me. This is super low priority (developing process and fixes are currently much more important). I just know, it's very important for MCL2 future, so let me articulate some blank and I'll appreciate if we polish it to some transitional (not final, just enough to take into the work) decision: We accept: 1. Every MC features up to version 1.12 JE. 2. Except features which couldn't be done easily and bugfree because of Minetest engine limitations. Eg. we CAN extend world boundaries by playing with map chunks, just teleporting player onto next layer after 31000 , but it would cost too much (time, code, bugs, performance, stability, etc). 3. Every already finished and working good features from versions above. 4. Some features, approved by the rest of the community, I mean maybe some voting and really missing any negative feedback. 5. All features documented by Wuzzy as done intentionally, like [this](https://git.minetest.land/MineClone2/MineClone2/issues/745#issuecomment-10118). We reject: 1. Any features which cause critical bugs, sending them to rework/fix or trying to fix immediately. 2. Maybe (I'm not sure) some small portions of big entirely missing features which just definitely break gamplay balance and gives nothing useful. 3. Controversial features, which somebody support, somebody doesn't, should be discussed well, with publishing forum announcements, at least during the week. In case if there are still doubts - send them into the mod.
aligator was assigned by kay27 2021-04-12 08:52:26 +02:00
jordan4ibanez was assigned by kay27 2021-04-12 08:52:26 +02:00
Rootyjr was assigned by kay27 2021-04-12 08:52:26 +02:00
Ghost was assigned by kay27 2021-04-12 08:52:27 +02:00
epCode was assigned by kay27 2021-04-12 08:52:27 +02:00
Wuzzy was assigned by kay27 2021-04-12 08:52:27 +02:00
bzoss was assigned by kay27 2021-04-12 08:52:27 +02:00
kay27 self-assigned this 2021-04-12 08:52:27 +02:00
ryvnf was assigned by kay27 2021-04-12 08:52:27 +02:00
tacotexmex was assigned by kay27 2021-04-12 08:52:27 +02:00
LizzyFleckenstein03 was assigned by kay27 2021-04-12 08:52:27 +02:00
MysticTempest was assigned by kay27 2021-04-12 08:52:27 +02:00
AFCMS was assigned by kay27 2021-04-12 08:52:27 +02:00
kneekoo was assigned by kay27 2021-04-12 08:52:27 +02:00
kay27 added the
gameplay
documentation
help wanted
#P6: low
needs discussion
labels 2021-04-12 08:53:57 +02:00
Author
Contributor

Okay, but then I shall reopen it for 'mineclone5' branch...

Okay, but then I shall reopen it for 'mineclone5' branch...

Ok

Ok
kay27 changed title from Compose and document a way how we accept/unaccept features to Compose and document a way how we accept/unaccept features for 'mineclone5' branch 2021-04-12 16:04:48 +02:00
kay27 reopened this issue 2021-04-12 16:05:00 +02:00
Ghost was assigned by Ghost 2021-04-13 14:23:52 +02:00
tacotexmex was unassigned by kay27 2021-04-15 09:39:53 +02:00
ryvnf removed their assignment 2021-04-18 11:48:44 +02:00
Author
Contributor

List of mentioned features of Minecraft, can't stop reading https://minecraft.fandom.com/wiki/Java_Edition_mentioned_features

I think we need to find a way to discuss features like a list, with possibility to upvote/downvote every feature. Just move up/down, like answers in stackoverflow :)

I'm renaming this issue back, because it's open question for me.

List of mentioned features of Minecraft, can't stop reading https://minecraft.fandom.com/wiki/Java_Edition_mentioned_features I think we need to find a way to discuss features like a list, with possibility to upvote/downvote every feature. Just move up/down, like answers in stackoverflow :) I'm renaming this issue back, because it's open question for me.
kay27 changed title from Compose and document a way how we accept/unaccept features for 'mineclone5' branch to Compose and document a way how we accept/unaccept features 2021-04-18 23:07:24 +02:00
LizzyFleckenstein03 removed their assignment 2021-11-13 18:21:56 +01:00

Err, if its open for the mineclone5 branch, and MineClone5 is now a game of its own, can this be closed yet?

Err, if its open for the mineclone5 branch, and MineClone5 is now a game of its own, can this be closed yet?
teknomunk added the
possible close
label 2025-01-07 05:13:39 +01:00
Member

Old meta issue that may be worth closing.

Old meta issue that may be worth closing.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No project
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: VoxeLibre/VoxeLibre#1537
No description provided.